Hirsch v. Harrison Factors Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*550Said subdivision (a) of item 14 requires plaintiff to set forth the names and addresses of her employees, but only as to those who, it is alleged, were induced to send orders directly to defendant instead of to plaintiff. Since the special damages sought by plaintiff are alleged to have been caused by defendant’s conduct in inducing plaintiff’s employees to send orders directly to defendant, the defendant is entitled to a bill of particulars giving the names and addresses of those persons who were so induced (Santoro v. Star & Crescent Milling Co., 244 App. Div. 750; Hainbach v. York Feather…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Santoro v. Star & Crescent Milling Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
- Hainbach v. York Feather & Down Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- Kosiorek v. HodgkinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951