The American Beauty
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion of the CourtNeterer, District Judge
(after stating the facts as above). There is no evidence of mutiny or insubordination on the part of the fishermen and seamen, nor is a custom shown that fishermen on a “lay” may be discharged at will.
*515The master testified that he was on the lookout for fish and in a situation where he could observe; that intervener Vila said, “Why don’t you go the other way? There are the fish.” Another witness testified that Vila said, “Why don’t you turn the boat around?” Another, on behalf of the claimants, testified that Vila said, “Right over here are the fish; where are you going to?” The master…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Caffray v. KingslandDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1885
- Keane v. Brig GloucesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1782
- The IantheDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1856
- Goodrich v. DomingoDistrict Court, D. California · 1870
- Mahoon v. The GlocesterPennsylvania Admiralty Court · 1780
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cape Shore Fish Co., Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
- The MontagueDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1943