Legal Opinion

State v. Thomas

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 22, 2018No. 105375PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK D. CELEBREZZE, JR., J.:

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Anthony Thomas ("appellant"), brings the instant appeal challenging his convictions and the trial court's sentence for robbery, abduction, and drug possession. Specifically, appellant argues that his guilty plea was not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily entered due to ineffective assistance of trial counsel; the trial court abused its discretion in failing to sua sponte vacate appellant's guilty plea; the trial court abused its discretion in denying his postsentence motion to withdraw his guilty plea; and the trial court erred by…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Tollett v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. State v. XieOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1977

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. NormanOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. State v. HawkeOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. State v. HeiseOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. State v. EdmondOhio Court of Appeals · 2026
  5. State v. SpannOhio Court of Appeals · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API