Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Vinciquerra v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1934No. 29062Published

1ConcurrenceDay, J.

The majority opinion holds that the instruction on circumstantial evidence inadvertently given by the able and experienced trial judge was reversible error. This was made imperative because the defendant requested an instruction which this court has held to be a proper and a necessary one since Walbridge v. State, 13 Neb. 236, was decided in 1882, which opinion was written by Maxwell, J. Numerous cases have been decided by this court upon the identical question involved in this case, including those cited in the majority opinion, and the rule has never been questioned until the dissenting…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Nichols v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Webb v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Smith v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Fetty v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Norton v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1930

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API