State v. Artis
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
GEER, Judge.
Defendant Gregory Requint Artis appeals from his conviction of malicious conduct by a prisoner and habitual misdemeanor assault and his sentencing as a habitual felon. His appeal rests solely on his contention that, under the United States Supreme Court’s decisions in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 147 L. Ed. 2d 435, 120 S. Ct. 2348 (2000), and Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 159 L. Ed. 2d 403, 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004), the habitual felon and habitual misdemeanor assault statutes can no longer be considered sentence-enhancing statutes. Instead, according to defendant,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. ToddSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- State v. ArtisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. ShawCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012