Thornton v. Cleveland
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Christine T. McMonagle, Judge.
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Robert D. Thornton, pro se, appeals from the trial court’s judgment granting the Civ.R. 12(C) motion for judgment on the pleadings filed by defendant-appellee, the city of Cleveland (“the city”). We affirm in part and reverse in part.
{¶ 2} Civ.R. 12(C) states that “[a]fter the pleadings are closed but within such time as not to delay the trial, any party may move for judgment on the pleadings.” A Civ.R. 12(C) motion for judgment on the pleadings has been characterized as a “belated Civ.R. 12(B)(6) motion for failure to state a claim…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State ex rel. Midwest Pride IV, Inc. v. PontiousOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Elston v. Howland Local SchoolsOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- Whaley v. Franklin County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- Fontbank, Inc. v. Compuserve, IncorporatedOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
- Gawloski v. Miller Brewing Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- DiGiorgio v. ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- McKee v. McCann, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County2017
- McKee v. McCannOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- Barton v. Cuyahoga CtyOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- Moran v. LewisOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.