Legal Opinion

Thornton v. Cleveland

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 10, 2008No. 89902PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Christine T. McMonagle, Judge.

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Robert D. Thornton, pro se, appeals from the trial court’s judgment granting the Civ.R. 12(C) motion for judgment on the pleadings filed by defendant-appellee, the city of Cleveland (“the city”). We affirm in part and reverse in part.

{¶ 2} Civ.R. 12(C) states that “[a]fter the pleadings are closed but within such time as not to delay the trial, any party may move for judgment on the pleadings.” A Civ.R. 12(C) motion for judgment on the pleadings has been characterized as a “belated Civ.R. 12(B)(6) motion for failure to state a claim…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Midwest Pride IV, Inc. v. PontiousOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Elston v. Howland Local SchoolsOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Whaley v. Franklin County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Fontbank, Inc. v. Compuserve, IncorporatedOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Gawloski v. Miller Brewing Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. DiGiorgio v. ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. McKee v. McCann, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County2017
  3. McKee v. McCannOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. Barton v. Cuyahoga CtyOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. Moran v. LewisOhio Court of Appeals · 2018

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API