Legal Opinion

Cranfill v. Hayden

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1904No. 1284PublishedCited by 58 opinions

Error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Fifth District, in an appeal from Dallas' County. Hayden sued Cranfill and others for libel, and had judgment, which was affirmed on appeal by defendants, who thereupon obtained writ of error.

1Opinion of the Court

CAINES, Chief Justice.

The Court of Civil Appeals have made a clear and accurate statement of the outlines of this case, which we adopt. It is as follows:

“This suit was brought by S. A. Hayden against J. B. Cranfill, J. M. Carroll, J. B. Gambrell, W. H. Jenkins, B. T. Hanks, L. M. Hays, C. W. Baines, T. J Walne, A. S. Baten, Bennet Hatcher, J. C. Burkett, R. A. Lee, I. B. Kimbrough, L. B. Hillican, J. B. Biddle and others to recover damages on account of the publication of an alleged libel. A jury trial resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff against the defendants named…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Atwater v. Morning News Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
  2. Howard v. ThompsonNew York Supreme Court · 1839
  3. Edwards v. ChandlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Frank B. Hall & Co., Inc. v. BuckCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
  2. Fitzjarrald v. Panhandle Publishing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Buck v. SavageCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  4. General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. HowardTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Bell Publshing Co. v. Garrett Engineering Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1943

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API