Legal Opinion

First Chrold Corp. v. Commissioner

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 30, 1939No. 385PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice RobeRTS

delivered the opinion of the Court. ■

This case presents the same question as that involved in No. 328, Helvering v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., ante, p. 110. Certiorari was granted because of a conflict in the decisions below. . The statutory provision under which this case arises is § 22 (a) of the Revenue Act of 1932, which is the same as the .corresponding section of the Revenue Act of 1928. The regulations, original and amended, have the same relation to this controversy as to that in No. 328. The Board of Tax Appeals sustained a determination of a deficiency in the petitioner’s tax for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. First Chrold Corp. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Helvering v. Edison Bros. Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
  2. Darling v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1965
  3. National Home Owners Service Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1939
  4. Edwin L. Wiegand Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1945
  5. Brown Shoe Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API