Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Nawn
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided February 7, 1985PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAbrams, J.
After being convicted of larceny, see G. L. c. 266, § 30, by a jury of six, the defendant, Paul Francis Nawn, Jr., was sentenced to thirty days in the Worcester County house of correction, seven days to be served. The remainder of the sentence was suspended and Nawn was placed on probation for two years. As a condition of his probation, Nawn was ordered to pay restitution of $2,000. On appeal, Nawn alleges error in (1) the empanelment, (2) four rulings by the judge, and (3) the procedure used to determine restitution. We affirm the conviction. However, we conclude that the procedure used to…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,351 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Commonwealth Chemical Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- United States v. SatterfieldCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WaiteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- Renfro v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
- Commonwealth v. RuffenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
- Commonwealth v. DenehyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
- Commonwealth v. LewisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.