Legal Opinion

United States v. Bianchi

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 8, 2009No. Criminal 06-19PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

KAUFFMAN, District Judge.

Now before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Judgment of Acquittal or New Trial (the “Motion”). For the reasons set forth below, the Motion will be denied.

I. BACKGROUND

This case presents an extraordinarily important issue: When the Government’s conduct intentionally precludes the attendance at trial of a member of the defense team, is the defendant entitled to a new trial if he fails to prove actual prejudice resulting from the misconduct?

On February 1, 2007, a grand jury sitting in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania issued a Second Superseding…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MaysCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  2. DRURY v. STATE OF NEW JERSEYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
  3. HARRITY v. JOHNSONDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API