Legal Opinion

Calcagno v. . Overby

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 20, 1940PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The motion for removal as a matter of right was denied by the court below on the ground that the motion was not made in apt time. It appeared that summons was served, and complaint filed 5 July, 1939. On August 4, 1939, the following order was entered by the clerk of the Superior Court: “Upon motion of defendant A. L. Overby, and by consent, it is ordered and adjudged that the defendant A. L. Overby shall have to and through August 23, 1939, to file answer in this action.” On 11 August, 1939, motions for removal were made by defendants Overby and Williams.

It is apparent that the motions to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Garrett & Co. v. BearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  2. Stevens Lumber Co. v. ArnoldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nello L. Teer Co. v. Hitchcock Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Goff v. Superior Courts in and for Counties of Pima and MaricopaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  3. Wiggins v. FinchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API