Legal Opinion

Kyburz v. Franklin

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided January 3, 1997No. 74,116PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Green, J.:

Arthur L. Kyburz and Mary M. Kyburz appeal from the judgment of the trial court dismissing their writ of mandamus petition. On appeal, the Kyburzes contend that K.S.A. 1995 Supp. 44-717(k) is constitutionally infirm because it denies them due process of law. Additionally, the Kyburzes contend that the trial court erred in determining that they had failed to exhaust their administrative remedies. We disagree and affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The Kyburzes owned and operated Art’s Tater Chip Company, Inc., when the company filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 1994. Before the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gillespie v. SeymourSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  2. State v. DurrantSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
  3. Adams v. Professional Practices CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
  4. Rydd v. State Board of HealthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  5. J. Enterprises, Inc. v. Board of Harvey County Comm'rsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nora H. Ringler Revocable Family Trust v. Meyer Land and Cattle Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1998
  2. Riedmiller v. HarnessCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API