Legal Opinion
State v. Romsky
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided April 10, 2002No. 01-KA-1067PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
817 So.2d 186 (2002)
STATE of Louisiana
v.
Steven ROMSKY.
No. 01-KA-1067.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit.
April 10, 2002.
Harry J. Morel, District Attorney, Howat A. Peters, Jr., Assistant District Attorney, Hahnville, LA, for Appellee.
C. Gary Wainwright, New Orleans, LA, for Appellant.
Panel composed of Judges THOMAS F. DALEY, JAMES L. CANNELLA and MARION F. EDWARDS.
EDWARDS, Judge.
Defendant Steven Romsky appeals the denial of his Motion to Suppress Evidence. For the foregoing reasons, we affirm, but remand for the limited purpose discussed infra.
The St. Charles Parish District Attorney…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- United States v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- State v. OliveauxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
- State v. WeilandLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. JosephLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
- State v. TurnerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2013
- State v. GranierLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
- State v. NeumanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
- State of Louisiana v. Christopher L. JonesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.