Legal Opinion

Foxx v. Williams

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 15, 1966No. Civ. 28545PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFiles, P. J.

Plaintiff Redd Foxx, an entertainer in nightclubs and on phonograph records, brought this action against Walter D. Williams, Jr., Dootone Record Manufacturing, Inc., and others, for a declaration of rights, accounting, and other relief under a written contract called “Artist Recording Royalty Agreement.” Dootone cross-complained against Foxx to recover moneys paid by mistake, for damages, and for an injunction to prohibit breaches of the contract. After a court trial, judgment was entered declaring the rights of the parties, awarding a money judgment in favor of cross-complainant for…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Andrews v. California Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Lyon v. GossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Gold Mining & Water Co. v. SwinertonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Poultry Producers of Southern California, Inc. v. BarlowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  5. People v. HillsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Arnold v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. Radioactive, J v. v. MansonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  3. Lemat Corp. v. BarryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. Kraisinger v. LiggettCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1979
  5. MCA Records, Inc. v. Newton-JohnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API