Legal Opinion

Southern Ry. Co. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 15, 1937No. 7971PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Circuit Judge.

Appellant, Southern Railway Company, was convicted of violating the penal provisions of section 18 of the rivers and harbors act of March 3, 1899 (33 U.S.C.A. § 502) on an information which charged willful refusal and failure to obey an order of the Secretary of War to alter a railroad bridge, owned and controlled by it, over the Tombigbee river at Jackson, Ala. A fine of $1,000 was imposed. Error is assigned to the overruling of a demurrer.

The information recited the order of the Secretary of War, which specified the alterations to be made, and alleged;

*33“That…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hagner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Union Bridge Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Evans v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. McKelvey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. President of the Monongahela Bridge Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sutton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
  2. Simmons v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
  3. United States v. DasherDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1943
  4. United States v. ChadwickDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. Sutton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API