Legal Opinion

State of Arizona v. Jose Dejesus Villegas-Rojas

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 28, 2012No. 2 CA-CR 2012-0296-PRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Chief Judge.

¶ 1 Pursuant to a plea agreement, petitioner José Villegas-Rojas pled guilty to aggravated driving under the influence of an intoxicant and felony endangerment, in exchange for the dismissal of one other count. The trial court sentenced him to presumptive, concuiTent sentences, the longer of which is 4.5 years. Villegas-Rojas filed a petition for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 32, Ariz. R. Crim. P., claiming the factual basis for the endangerment charge was insufficient as a matter of law and his conviction was the product of ineffective assistance of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. State v. NashArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. SwoopesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  5. State v. TschilarCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Michaelson v. GarrCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  2. Bauer 297583 v. ShinnDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
  3. State v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
  4. State v. GutierrezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API