Legal Opinion

KULO v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 23, 2012No. 5D11-2318Published

1Per curiam

We affirm in all respects. We remand, however, for correction of a scrivener’s error. The order reflects that the appellant violated conditions of probation 6 and 8. The record demonstrates, however, that he was found to have violated condition 5 and a special condition concerning attendance at AA meetings. The order on remand should be corrected as indicated.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED.

PALMER, MONACO and TORPY, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Shade v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012