Legal Opinion

Hansson v. General Insulation & Acoustics

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 16, 1959No. 17505PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, Justice.

This appeal comes from the Richland County Court wherein plaintiff sought judgment in the amount of $2,367- .82, allegedly due and owing for acoustical tile sold and delivered to defendant. Defendant duly answered setting up a general denial and counterclaim to which plaintiff replied denying material allegations of the counterclaim and pleading an accord and satisfaction and a novation, the Statute of Frauds and defective workmanship by defendant in installing the acoustical tile in question.

The matter came on for trial before the Honorable Legare Bates, Judge of the Richland…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. BurnettSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1954
  2. A.M. Law Co., Inc. v. ClevelandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
  3. Schreiberg v. Southern Coatings & Chemical Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1957

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Martin v. DunlapSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Moultrie v. Medical Univ. of SCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  3. Cornwell v. PlummerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API