Hansson v. General Insulation & Acoustics
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, Justice.
This appeal comes from the Richland County Court wherein plaintiff sought judgment in the amount of $2,367- .82, allegedly due and owing for acoustical tile sold and delivered to defendant. Defendant duly answered setting up a general denial and counterclaim to which plaintiff replied denying material allegations of the counterclaim and pleading an accord and satisfaction and a novation, the Statute of Frauds and defective workmanship by defendant in installing the acoustical tile in question.
The matter came on for trial before the Honorable Legare Bates, Judge of the Richland…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. BurnettSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1954
- A.M. Law Co., Inc. v. ClevelandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
- Schreiberg v. Southern Coatings & Chemical Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
3Cited by3 opinions
- Martin v. DunlapSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
- Moultrie v. Medical Univ. of SCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
- Cornwell v. PlummerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975