State Ex Rel. Road Commission v. Noble
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WORTHEN, Justice.
Appeal from a judgment upon a verdict of a jury awarding defendants $150,000. Interest in the sum of $7,321.05, being interest on said $150,000 from date of occupancy by plaintiff at 8% per annum, was added.
The State of Utah through its State Road Commission brought this action to condemn approximately 8.1 acres of land belonging to defendants in Salt Lake and Davis Counties for highway purposes. The only question for determination is this: Does the evidence support the jury’s verdict?
The evidence reveals that the property in question located between U. S. Highway 91 and the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Penn. Schuyl. V. R. v. ClearySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
- United States Ex Rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. Indian Creek Marble Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1941
- Searle v. Lackawanna & Bloomsburg RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1859
- Nedrow v. Michigan-Wisconsin Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. HaywardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1963
- Utah Department of Transportation v. Admiral Beverage Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2011
- Utah State Road Commission v. FribergUtah Supreme Court · 1984
- Pieper v. City of ScottsbluffNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
- Werner v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.