Legal Opinion · Concurrence

McCoy v. Calamia

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 5, 1995No. 94-1274Published

1Concurrence

liKNOLL, Judge,

concurring.

For the following reasons, I agree with the results reached in the majority opinion. In my view, this medical malpractice claim was completely meritless and the jury correctly denied liability, and the trial judge correctly assessed Dr. Sanders’ deposition costs and correctly ruled on the contempt motion. Although these issues were not assigned as error, the majority reviewed these issues for manifest error. I express concern in reviewing errors not assigned as we rarely do this and normally do this only in the interest of justice. I recognize and agree with the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Warthen v. WarthenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API