Legal Opinion

Carol M. Read v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided February 4, 2000No. 19001-97, 19322-97, 19328-97Unknown

1Opinion of the Court

114 T.C. No. 2

UNITED STATES TAX COURT CAROL M. READ, ET AL.,1 Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket Nos. 19001-97, 19322-97, Filed February 4, 2000. 19328-97. W and H, who were married, owned all of the vot- ing, and virtually all of the nonvoting, stock of X corporation (X). They divorced, and the final judgment dissolving their marriage (divorce judgment) ordered (1) that W sell and convey to H, or at H's election to X or X's ESOP plan, all of her X stock, (2) that H, or at H's election X or X's ESOP plan, pay a stated amount of cash to W simultaneously with the…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Lucas v. EarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Jack E. Golsen and Sylvia H. Golsen v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
  3. Commissioner v. Court Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Enoch v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1972
  5. United States v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API