Legal Opinion

Monarch Marking System Co. v. Reed's Photo Mart, Inc.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1972No. B-3250PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPE, Justice.

The Monarch Marking System Company (Monarch) sued Reed’s Photo Mart, Inc., (Reed’s) to recover the price of four million adhesive pricing labels which Monarch furnished Reed’s pursuant to a written purchase order. Reed’s defenses were that it mistakenly ordered four million instead of four thousand labels and that Monarch did not substantially comply with the terms of the purchase order. The trial court rendered judgment on the jury verdict and awarded Monarch $2,680 as the reasonable value of the labels and $750 as reasonable attorney fees. The court of civil appeals reversed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. James T. Taylor & Son, Inc. v. Arlington Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  2. McDonald v. SimonsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  3. Cator v. Commonwealth Bonding & Casualty Ins. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1919
  4. Clem Lumber Co. v. MartyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  5. Kesler v. ZimmerschitteTexas Supreme Court · 1846

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Edwards v. Mid-Continent Office Distributors, L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2008
  2. In Re: Ual Corporation, Debtors. Appeal Of: U.S. Bank National AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  3. International Insurance Company v. JataineCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  4. American National Insurance Co. v. Gifford-Hill & Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1984
  5. Bates v. LaminackDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API