In re Thompson
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
In Bankruptcy. In the matter of Josiah Van Kirk Thompson, bankrupt.
1Opinion of the Court
THOMSON, District Judge.
We have, on certificate for review, the question of the correctness of the referee’s action in allowing the claim of F. E. Markell in the sum of $19,600.39. The facts in their chronological order, are these:
In 1907, three notes of Jasper Augustine were accepted by the Citizens’ National Bank of Connellsville, two for $16,000 each, and one for $18,000, aggregating $50,000, for which the bank paid $42,500. Interest being paid on the notes to 1909, Thompson, the bankrupt, on the purchase of certain coal property, assumed the payment of these notes. In 1913, Thompson…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bardes v. Hawarden BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Hiscock v. Varick Bank of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Pauly v. State Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Cochran v. EldridgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1865
- In re MertensCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1906
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pepper v. LittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Gins v. Mauser Plumbing Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- In re ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1922
- In re AlbrightDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1927
- Artisti-kote Co. v. Benefactor Building & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.