Gargiulo v. California Wineries & Distilleries
New York Supreme Court
Motion to set aside a verdict and for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtFord, J.
After rendition of a special verdict finding the market price from which the damages could be computed, a general verdict was directed in favor of the plaintiff. The question here arises upon a motion *693to set aside the verdict and for a new trial. Plaintiff was doing business as a wine and liquor merchant under a trade name, and entered into a contract with the defendant, a California corporation, for the shipment to him in New York of 750 barrels of wine by monthly deliveries, extending over a year beginning December, 1912, as directed by plaintiff, and to be paid for thirty days after each…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Devlin v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Rochester Lantern Co. v. Stiles & Parker Press Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
- New England Iron Co. v. Gilbert (Metropolitan) Elevated RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Liberty Wall Paper Co. v. Stoner Wall Paper Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
3Cited by2 opinions
- Seligman & Latz, Inc. v. NoonanNew York Supreme Court · 1951
- Canister Co. v. National Can CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1947