Aetna Life Insurance v. Bayona
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SILVERMAN, Circuit Judge:
We hold today that a plan fiduciary may file an interpleader action under ERISA in an appropriate case.
Appellant Emelita Castro appeals the district court’s grant of appellee Aetna Life Insurance Company’s motion for in-terpleader discharge, and the district court’s dismissal of her counterclaims against Aetna, Good Samaritan Hospital, and the Good Samaritan Bene-Flex Plan. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm the district court.
I
Evangeline Castro was a nurse employed by Good Samaritan Hospital. Aet-na Life Insurance Company issued a group…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Cory v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Leroy Ellenburg, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee. v. Brockway, Inc. & Spellman Cunningham, Defendants-Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- 21 Employee Benefits Cas. 1341, Pens. Plan Guide (Cch) P 23937j Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Julie A. Marsh, Dana Lyn Weaver and James R. Marsh, IIICourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Watkins v. Westinghouse Hanford Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Aetna Life Insurance Company v. Rey L. BayonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000