Legal Opinion

Aetna Life Insurance v. Bayona

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 8, 2000No. 99-55035PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SILVERMAN, Circuit Judge:

We hold today that a plan fiduciary may file an interpleader action under ERISA in an appropriate case.

Appellant Emelita Castro appeals the district court’s grant of appellee Aetna Life Insurance Company’s motion for in-terpleader discharge, and the district court’s dismissal of her counterclaims against Aetna, Good Samaritan Hospital, and the Good Samaritan Bene-Flex Plan. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm the district court.

I

Evangeline Castro was a nurse employed by Good Samaritan Hospital. Aet-na Life Insurance Company issued a group…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Cory v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Leroy Ellenburg, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee. v. Brockway, Inc. & Spellman Cunningham, Defendants-Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  4. 21 Employee Benefits Cas. 1341, Pens. Plan Guide (Cch) P 23937j Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Julie A. Marsh, Dana Lyn Weaver and James R. Marsh, IIICourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  5. Watkins v. Westinghouse Hanford Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Aetna Life Insurance Company v. Rey L. BayonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API