Legal Opinion

Weber v. Village of Carol Stream

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 31, 1984No. 83-1061PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Reinhard

Plaintiff, Mary Canfield Weber, administrator of the estate of George Canfield, deceased, appeals from orders granting summary judgment for defendants, the village of Carol Stream (village) and Kaufman & Broad Homes, Inc. (K & B), finding the defendants owed no duty to plaintiff’s decedent as a matter of law.

The single issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred when it ruled that defendants owed no duty to plaintiff’s decedent, who fell through an ice-covered water retention pond, located in a residential subdivision, alleged to be owned, possessed, and controlled by K & B.

Plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kahn v. James Burton Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Hatten v. Mason Realty CompanyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Corcoran v. Village of LibertyvilleIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Fuller v. JusticeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  5. Cope v. DoeIllinois Supreme Court · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  2. Casper v. Charles F. Smith & Son, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  3. Ross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  4. Casper v. Chas. F. Smith & Son, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  5. Coleman v. Windy City Balloon Port, Ltd.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API