Legal Opinion

Field v. Magee

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1899PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Chippewa; Steere, J. Case by Nathaniel L. Field against Michael J. Magee for libel. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This is an action of libel. The publication complained of was the following:

“Slandered the French.
“ The Democrat takes exception to a remark attributed to Postmaster Field, of Rudyard, who is known as one of the ring’s chief heelers. The political situation was being discussed by Mr. Field and another heeler, when the latter remarked that, owing to so many French settlers coming into Rudyard, the township would probably go Democratic this fall. ‘ Oh, to h- — -1 with the French! ’ Field remarked; ‘there is not one of them in the county that cannot be bought for a two-dollar bill.’ This was a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Belknap v. BallMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  2. McGee v. BaumgartnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Randall v. Evening News Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Spray v. AyotteMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Eikhoff v. GilbertMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Hewitt v. East Jordan Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1904
  4. In Re Barth's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Stern v. GaldonyiMichigan Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API