Legal Opinion

Martin v. Casagrande

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 13, 1990No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Green, J.

The central issue presented on this appeal is whether an employee whose injury has been determined to be compensable by the Workers’ Compensation Board and who has accepted workers’ compensation benefits is barred from bringing a direct action for intentional tort against his employer. We hold that, under such circumstances, workers’ compensation is the employee’s exclusive remedy.

Richard Martin, a former professional hockey player with the Buffalo Sabres, brought an action against the Sabres, Sabres General Manager Scotty Bowman and team doctor Peter Casagrande…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Murray v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Burlew v. American Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Werner v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Finch v. SwinglyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  5. Cunningham v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Martin v. Lancaster Battery Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. TOMUSHUNAS, DEBBIE v. DESIGNCRETE OF AMERICA, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. Riggins v. StongAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. Babcock v. LambAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. Martin v. Lancaster Battery Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API