Legal Opinion
Vann v. Kreindler, Relkin & Goldberg
New York Court of Appeals
Decided October 22, 1981PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
Plaintiff signed a partnership agreement with the law firm of Kreindler, Relkin, Olick & Goldberg in December, 1972. That agreement contained a clause requiring the submission to arbitration of any controversy arising out of or relating to the agreement. Plaintiff Ti'ow seeks to stay arbitration of his claim against the successor firm of Kreindler, Relkin & Goldberg for an accounting and damages.
It is true that the original partnership dissolved upon Olick’s withdrawal in 1974 (see Partnership…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Levin-Townsend Computer Corp. & HollandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
- Alpert v. BannonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
3Cited by20 opinions
- Cohen v. LordNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Park South Hotel Corporation v. New York Hotel Trades Council and Hotel Association of New York City, Inc., Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Brown v. V&R Advertising, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- In Re C-TC 9th Avenue PartnershipUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · 1995
- Intercontinental Packaging Co. v. China National Cereals, Oils & Foodstuffs Import & Export Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.