Legal Opinion

Noecker v. Wallingford

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 11, 1907PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Washington District Court.— IIon. John T. Scott, Judge. Action in equity for partition of real estate. The case is stated in the opinion. The decree was adverse to both plaintiff and Martha A. Wallingford in some respects, and each has. appealed. Plaintiff will be denominated the appellant.—

1Opinion of the Court

Bishop, J.—

The plaintiff and the defendant Martha A. Wallingford are brother and sister. The defendant D. H. Wallingford is the husband of his codefendant. In the year 1887 plaintiff and his sister became joint owners, through inheritance, of a farm in Washington county and considerable personal property situated thereon. Both were unmarried at the time, and they went into possession with the understanding and agreement that the farm should be carried on in their joint interest, plaintiff to attend to the outside farm work and business, and his sister to perform the duties common to a farm…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hubbard v. WeareSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
  2. Presser v. HildenbrandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
  3. Henderson v. BeattySupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  4. Leach v. ForneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1866
  5. Wilmer v. FarrisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Tebeau v. RidgeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
  2. Fisher v. MillerSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  3. Long v. ChandlerCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1914
  4. Najarian v. BoyajianSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1927
  5. Rosenow v. MillerMontana Supreme Court · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API