Legal Opinion

Brown & Co. v. Rathburn

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1882PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Douglas County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Watson, J.:

The appellants, as assignees of lea F. Bice, brought this action against the respondents to recover the amount of a *159certain promissory note, executed by tbe respondents in favor of Bice, in the following form:

“Oakland, Oregon, September 25, 1878.
“Two years after date, without grace, we, or either of us, promise to pay to lea B. Bice, the sum of six hundred dollars, in United States gold coin, value received.

S. Y. B. Bathburn,

Thomas Hanna,

C. B. Hanna.”

The respondents filed a joint answer denying the assignment, and alleging, as a separate defense, the lease of a farm…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hubbard v. . GurneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. Rogers v. Trustees of Schools of Township 23Illinois Supreme Court · 1868

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cellers v. MeachemOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Lumbermen's Nat. Bank v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Hoffman v. HabighorstOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  4. White v. SavageOregon Supreme Court · 1906
  5. American & General Mortg. & Inv. Corp. v. MarquamU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1894

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API