Legal Opinion

Spalding v. Hill

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 15, 1915No. 4182PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from Superior Court, Garfield County; Dan Huett, Judge. Action by Lucretia Hill against H. M. Spalding. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Per curiam

This is an action to clear title to lots numbered 6 to 24, inclusive, in block 76, and lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 7, in block 75, all in North Enid. Although plaintiff alleged herself to be the owner and in possession of the lots for ten years last past, the evidence disclosed her possession to be adverse for that time under a tax deed conceded to be void on its face. The object of the suit was to cancel a deed from the owner of the fee, made, executed, and delivered to defendant, Spalding, while out of possession, in violation of our champerty statute (Rev. Laws 1910, sec. 2260). The court…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lewis v. ClementsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Clark v. HolmesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Mason v. GatesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Clark v. DuncansonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Perry v. SnyderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. Wilcox v. WesterheideSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  4. Clewell v. CottleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Going v. GreenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API