Legal Opinion

Dallas v. Fitzsimmons

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 17, 1958No. 17755PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sutton

The parties are here in the same relative position as in the trial court and will be referred to as plaintiffs and defendants or by name. The State Board of Land Commissioners, not a party hereto, will be referred to as the Board.

*198Plaintiffs brought an ejectment action against defendants claiming all the mining rights on a half section of state land in Park County,- Colorado, under a mining lease granted to them by the Board. Defendants claim a portion of the land involved by allegedly valid prior lode mining locations under state law. Judgment was for defendants below and after the trial…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Book v. Justice Min. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1893
  2. Nevada Sierra Oil Co. v. Home Oil Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1899
  3. Globe Mining Co. v. AndersonWyoming Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Smaller v. LeachSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Western Standard Uranium Company v. ThurstonWyoming Supreme Court · 1960
  2. City of Westminster v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
  3. Ranchers Exploration and Development Co. v. Anaconda Co.District Court, D. Utah · 1965
  4. Griffith v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Board of Land Commissioners of the Department of Natural Resources v. District Court of the Fourteenth Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API