Hereden v. Multiple Injury Trust Fund
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN F. REIF, Vice-Chief Judge.
T1 Glen Hereden seeks review of the order entered by the three-judge panel on his claim for benefits from the Multiple Injury Trust Fund. Mr. Hereden contends that the three-judge panel erred by not considering pre-existing impairment in his left eye in deciding issues of material increase and permanent total disability.
[ 2 There was no dispute that Mr. Hereden injured his left eye in 1982 and developed a traumatic cataract on the lens as a result. There was, also no dispute that the lens of his left eye was surgically removed and an artificial intraocular lens…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Special Indemnity Fund v. ChoateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Special Indemnity Fund v. HuntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
- Special Indemnity Fund of the State v. StoveallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
- M.S. Osher, M.D. & R.S. Kerstine, M.D., Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Reynolds v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
3Cited by3 opinions
- Reynolds v. IC of Oklahoma, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
- Reynolds v. IC of Oklahoma, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
- Reynolds v. IC of Oklahoma, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011