Arrion Walton v. State of Indiana

I would resolve this ease differently from the majority in three respects. First, I would conclude that the SVF statute does not support two convictions under these facts. Second, because the trial court orally entered judgment of conviction on the lesser-included possession counts, and having already identified multiple issues with the sentencing order, I would instruct the-trial court to vacate the lesser-included counts that it later merged. Third, although I agree that Walton’s drug-related counts warrant concurrent, sentences under Beno and its progeny,- in light .of the resultant…