Truck Insurance Exchange v. Hale

BERNSTEIN, Chief Justice.

Appellant insurance company was defendant in a suit on a fire insurance policy. A verdict and judgment were rendered against defendant. Defendant made several motions: a motion for a directed *78verdict at the end of plaintiff’s case and at the close of all the evidence and a motion for judgment n. o. v. Defendant now appeals, in part, the denial of these motions. So far as that denial is concerned, this court must draw from the evidence all reasonable and justifiable inferences favorable to the verdict. Tucson Title Ins. Co. v. D’Ascoli, 94 Ariz. 230, 383 P.2d 119.

Viewed…