Legal Opinion

In Re Frankovitch

California Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1923No. Crim. No. 2551PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPLICATION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus to release one convicted of violation of the Wright Act. Writ denied. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Petitioner seeks the release of John Franhovitch on habeas corpus. Frankovitch was convicted of selling liquor in violation of the Wright Act (Stats. 1921, p. 79), “and judgment was passed upon him to this effect: that he, the said John Frankovitch, was to pay a fine of $500.00 or be confined in the City Jail for the period of six months upon his failure to pay said fine.” On February 13, 1923, Frankovitch notified the trial court that he was unable to pay the fine or any part thereof, whereupon he was committed to the county jail for the period of six months. The Volstead Act (41…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. LambCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  2. People v. PagniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API