Legal Opinion

Department of Finance v. Huizenga

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1942No. 26535. Judgment affirmedPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Farthing

This is an appeal from a judgment, in an action of debt, rendered by the municipal court of Chicago against Clarence Huizenga, for $516.82. Under the Retailers’ Occupation Tax act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1939, chap. 120, par. 443) the Department of Finance of the State of Illinois had made a corrected return and had assessed a taSc and penalties against the appellant. The defendant appealed directly to this court as the revenue is involved.

He was engaged in selling tangible personal property at retail in Cook county from July 1, 1933, through March 15, 1938. For many months during that period he did…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Department of Finance v. GoldIllinois Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Hoffman & Morton Co. v. Department of FinanceIllinois Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Calderwood Corp. v. MahinIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  2. PEOPLE EX. REL. PETERSEN v. Turner Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  3. Department of Finance v. KilbaneIllinois Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Department of Finance v. SinclairIllinois Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API