Legal Opinion

Smith v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 21, 1934No. 742PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McReynolds

By complaint filed in the District Court for Oregon, May 22, 1929, petitioner sought judgment against the United States for benefits said to have accrued to her under War Risk Insurance taken out by her son, Elias Melvin Zimmerman, in 1917. While enlisted in the Naval Service he died aboard the U.S.S. “ Conestoga ” June 30, 1921.

The United States denied liability upon the ground that the policy lapsed for nonpayment of premiums and was not in force after April 30, 1918.

By agreement the cause was tried without a jury. The District Court gave judgment for the complainant— petitioner here; the…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. Lillian P. Hoffart, Administratrix of the Estate of Charles P. Hoffart, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1958
  2. Lawrence Gray, Administrator of the Estate of Mildred Reed Wood v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  3. United States v. CookU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1975
  4. Spyra v. Government Personnel Mut. Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  5. Lawrence Gray, Administrator of the Estate of Mildred Reed Wood v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API