Richmond v. Stahle
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Ejectment ; brought to the Superior Court in New London County, and tried to the jury before Pardee, J. Yerdict for the plaintiff, and motion for a new trial by the defendant. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Park, 0. J.
On the trial of this cause in the court below tho defendant claimed, and offered evidence to prove, that his grantors and himself had been in the open, visible and exclusive possession of the premises in dispute from the first day of April, 1858, to the time of trial, claiming title. It appeared in evidence that during some portion of this time one of the plaintiff’s grantors had occupied part of the premises in dispute, and in order to explain the occupancy and show that it was consistent with the exclusive possession of ^jjhe premises by the defendant and his grantors, the…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Peck v. PierceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
- Vaccaro v. Shell Beach Condominium, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- Logan v. Carrington Publishing Co.Connecticut Superior Court · 1948
- Logan v. Carrington Publishing Co.Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1948
- Shaftel v. ShaftelConnecticut Superior Court · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.