Legal Opinion
Bandes v. Triborough Bridge Authority
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided December 28, 1936Published
1Opinion of the CourtRyan, J.
Plaintiff sues as an assignee of moneys due under a public improvement contract, and trial was had before the court without a jury. The contract in question was known as No. 44, and was entered into by Triborough Bridge Authority on the one part and Max Hochman as the contractor on the other part, on April 8, 1935, for the demolition of additional buildings to the Manhattan approach of the Triborough Bridge. Remaining unpaid on the contract is a balance of $3,760, now in the possession of the comptroller of the city of New York. The assignment in question provided, among other things, that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Arkansas Valley Smelting Co. v. Belden Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Fortunato v. . PattenNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Portuguese-American Bank of San Francisco v. WellesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- State Bank v. Central Mercantile BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Sacks v. Neptune Meter Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.