Legal Opinion

Kirkpatrick v. Diversified Sports, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 9, 1995No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion granted. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment on Labor Law § 240 (1) liability. Plaintiffs established that Timothy A. Kirkpatrick (plaintiff) was injured when he fell from a ladder placed on top of scaffolding while painting the basketball court at the Sundown Fitness Club and that defendants violated their duty under Labor Law § 240 "to provide adequate safety devices and ensure that they were properly placed and operated to protect plaintiff” (Spike v Hollands’ Lbr. Co., 198…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Haimes v. New York Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Marasco v. KaplanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. Morris v. Mark IV Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. Spike v. Hollands' Lumber Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Campisiv. Epos Contracting Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Peglow v. L & A BuildersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API