Legal Opinion

In re Romaine

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1863PublishedCited by 6 opinions

This was an application to be discharged from arrest on habeas corpus. On the second day of November, 1863, HUI Beachy and Thomas Farrell presented to the Governor of California the following requisition, and affidavit annexed, and demanded a warrant for the arrest of the petitioners: Executive Office, Lewiston, Idaho Territory, ) United States of America, a.d., 1863. ¡ To Ms Excellency the Gcovernor of British Columbia, or of the State of California: Be it known, that on…

Read the full summary

This was an application to be discharged from arrest on habeas corpus. On the second day of November, 1863, HUI Beachy and Thomas Farrell presented to the Governor of California the following requisition, and affidavit annexed, and demanded a warrant for the arrest of the petitioners: Executive Office, Lewiston, Idaho Territory, ) United States of America, a.d., 1863. ¡ To Ms Excellency the Gcovernor of British Columbia, or of the State of California: Be it known, that on this twenty-third day of October, a.d., 1863, personally appeared before me, W. H. Wickersham, who presented to me an…

1Opinion of the Court

The application for discharge was heard before Justice Crocker,, by whom the opinion was delivered.

*589The parties in this case were arrested and held in custody under a warrant issued by the Governor of this State, upon a requisition made by the acting Governor of Idaho Territory, alleging that they were charged with the crime of murder and highway robbery, committed in Idaho Territory, and that they fled from that Territory to this State. They have obtained a writ of habeas corpus to determine the validity of their arrest and imprisonment.

The first question raised by the counsel for the…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kingsbury's caseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  2. Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  3. State ex rel. Stundahl v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  4. In Re MorganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. State Ex Rel. v. CloughSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1902

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API