Legal Opinion
Pahuta v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided June 7, 1999No. 1:91-cv-00107PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
HECKMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the parties have consented to have the undersigned conduct all proceedings in this case, including the entry of final judgment (Item 19). Following a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff, defendant Massey-Ferguson appealed to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. The Second Circuit vacated the final judgment and remanded the case for a new trial.
Defendant moves to limit the second trial solely to the issue of defendant’s liability (Item 202). Absent any limiting instructions to the contrary, a mandate…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Berkey Photo, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Eastman Kodak Company, Defendant-Appellant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Briggs v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Prisco v. A & D Carting Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Pahuta v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Carl O. Akermanis, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Sea-Land Service, Inc., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Schwartz v. ChanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2001
- United States Ex Rel. Miller v. Bill Harbert International Construction, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011