Legal Opinion

DeWeerth v. Baldinger

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 16, 1992No. 83 Civ. 1233 (VLB)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER

(RULE 60 APPLICATION)

VINCENT L. BRODERICK, District Judge.

I

This action concerns plaintiffs claim to the ownership of a painting by Claude Monet entitled “Champs de Ble a Vetheuil” (the “Monet”), which was stolen from plaintiff in 1945 and purchased in good faith by the defendant in 1957 from third-party defendant Wildenstein & Co. On April 20, 1987, after a bench trial, I issued a decision including findings of fact and conclusions of law in this matter and ordered that judgment be rendered for the plaintiff requiring that the painting be returned to the plaintiff. DeWeerth v.…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Rufo v. Inmates of Suffolk County JailSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gerda Dorothea Deweerth v. Edith Marks Baldinger, Defendant-Third-Party-Plaintiff-Appellant, Wildenstein & Co., Inc., Third-Party-Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  2. Jose Hernandez v. Results Staffing, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  3. Gilbert v. Dresser Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1993
  4. Manhattan Cable Television, Inc. v. Cable Doctor, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
  5. Mccarthy v. Olin CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API