Legal Opinion

United States v. Worthy

District Court, D. Maine

Decided February 6, 2012No. 2:10-CR-136-DBH-03Published

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT WORTHY’S PENDING MOTIONS

D. BROCK HORNBY, District Judge.

Drug conspiracy charges can present complex issues in trial preparation. Here, the ordinary complexity has been exacerbated by the government’s succession of charges — Complaint, Indictment, First Superseding Indictment, Second Superseding Indictment, Third Superseding Indictment, and now Fourth Superseding Indictment1 (Docket Items 1, 28, 51, 94, 232, 507). Not surprisingly, the practice has produced a bevy of defense motions both earlier and now. Although I do not fully comprehend the need for this…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. United States v. James Earl PaivaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  3. United States v. Mario E. IndoratoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
  4. United States v. Lee Travis AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
  5. United States v. Jelili Olaose GiwaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API