Legal Opinion

Dinwiddle v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 6, 1942No. 4-6819PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcHaney, J.

On June 4, 1941, Leo Hairell sliot and mortally wounded liis wife, Lucille Hairell, and then shot and killed himself, she surviving him about two hours. He was an employee of Ely & Walker Dry Goods Company, Paragould, Arkansas, and as such his life was insured in the sum of $500 under a group life insurance policy issued by appellee to his employer and a certificate of such insurance issued to him in which his wife, Lucille, was named the beneficiary. Said certificate contained the following’ language: “In the event of the death of any beneficiary, prior to that of the employee, the interest…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Watkins v. Home Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  2. Sovereign Camp Woodmen of the World v. IsraelSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ivy Rogers v. Unionmutual Stock Life Insurance Company of America v. John Wilson Vargo, of the Estate of Barbara Ann Vargo Rogers, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
  2. Washburn v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1945
  3. Munn v. RobisonDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1950
  4. In Re Fenner's EstateUtah Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Bair v. WillisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API