Legal Opinion · Dissent

Droste v. Kerner

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1966No. 38249, 38905 consPublished

1DissentJustice Schaefer

By a curious inversion the majority opinion first decides the case on the merits, and then determines that the plaintiff has no standing to raise the issues that have already been decided. I am unable to agree with either determination. The nature of the problems, and their importance, preclude a cursory statement of the reasons for my disagreement.

Illinois has long recognized the right of a citizen and taxpayer to sue in equity to enjoin the misappropriation of public funds. In Colton v. Hanchett, (1852) 13 Ill. 615, a taxpayer was permitted to sue to enjoin the county Board of Supervisors…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Fergus v. RusselIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Bowman v. County of LakeIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  3. City of Springfield v. EdwardsIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Bowes v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1954
  5. City of Chicago v. Union Building Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1882

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API