Legal Opinion
Udell v. Naghavi
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 15, 2011PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*961The appeal from the intermediate order entered May 18, 2010, must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248 [1976]). The issues raised on the appeal from that order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (see CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).
The appeal from the order dated August 23, 2010, also must be dismissed. It is the obligation of the appellant to assemble a proper record on appeal (see LaSalle Bank N.A. v Henderson, 69 AD3d 679 [2010]; Wen Zong Yu v Hua…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- In re AhoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Stukas v. StreiterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- McDermott v. TorreNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Nykorchuck v. HenriquesNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Schwelnus v. Urological Associates of L.I., P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Cope v. BarakaatAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Osborn v. DeChiaraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018