In re Steuer
District Court, D. Massachusetts
In Bankruptcy. On petition to review action of referee.
1Opinion of the Court
LOWELL, District Judge.
In this case a petition was filed April 20, 1899, by the trustees against the bankrupt, his wife, and the firm of Pangbourn & Wilson, asking that they be enjoined from disposing of certain brick alleged to have been transferred by the bankrupt to Pangbourn & Wilson by way of. preference voidable under the bankrupt act. The petition was filed with the referee, and thereupon the following proceedings were had: Besides the petition above mentioned, another petition was filed on the same date, praying that Pangbourn & Wilson and the bankrupt’s wife might be made parties to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bardes v. Hawarden BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Eyster v. GaffSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- White v. EwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Marshall v. KnoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Smith v. MasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- In re BerryDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1917
- Detroit Trust Co. v. Pontiac Savings BankCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912
- McEldowney v. CardU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Tennessee · 1911
- In re Patterson-MacDonald Shipbuilding Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1922
- Bachman v. McCluerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.